Friday 24 December 2021

Tristeza de nubosidad e interminable lluvia

 

Pinta de cerveza Carling. London, 2021. Por Vicente Alonso Fontelos


Por Gema Galante Picazo


Tristeza de nubosidad e interminable lluvia; días…

Envuelta en húmeda bruma, calados los huesos, traspasada el alma, días... 

Olvidado el instante de la risa, días...

Borrada toda la ilusión reposada entre los largos dedos de mi rosácea aurora, días...

Donde el axioma del hastío anida invadiendo hasta la nada, días…

 


Thursday 11 February 2021

Reproducing 150 Research Papers and Testing Them in the Real World: Challenges and Solutions


In this talk, Grigori Fursin describes his 10-year effort to solve numerous reproducibility issues in ML and systems research and make it easier to use it in the real world. He will share his experience reproducing 150+ research papers during artifact evaluation at multiple ACM conferences. This tedious experience motivated him to develop the Collective Knowledge framework and the cKnowledge.io portal to bring DevOps principles to CS research. He will also present portable CK workflows with plug & play components to package and share research artifacts and results with common Python APIs, reusable automation actions and unified meta descriptions. Such workflows can be used to automatically build, benchmark and validate research techniques across continuously evolving technology stacks.

Fursin will conclude with several practical use-cases of this technology to automate benchmarking, optimization, and co-design of efficient computer systems in collaboration with Arm, IBM, General Motors, ACM, the Raspberry Pi foundation, and MLPerf. His long-term goal is to help researchers share their new research techniques as portable and production-ready packages along with published papers that can be quickly validated by volunteers and adopted by industry.

Grigori FursinPresident, cTuning Foundation; Founder, cKnowledge.io; ACM Taskforce on Reproducibility


Reproducing 150 Research Papers and Testing Them in the Real World: Challenges and Solutions

Tuesday 15 January 2019

CENTENARY OF THE KILL OF RED ROSA LUXEMBURG


Rosa Luxemburg memorial (Berlin-Tiergarten)

By Vicente Alonso-Fontelos
 
The female PhD, Rosa Luxemburg, received her Doctor of Law degree, officially presented in the spring of 1897 at the University of Zurich.

On January 15, 1919, one hundred years ago, the Social Democrat Friedrich Ebert ordered the nationalist paramilitary militia, the "Free Body" (Freikorps), to destroy the left-wing revolution. Rosa Luxemburg was captured in Berlin, being tortured and killed that same day. Rosa Luxemburg was shot down with rifle butts by several soldiers, four men then shot him in the back, and then shot in the head. His body was released to the Berlin's Landwehr Canal. It was an ignominious end for the famous female PhD and revolutionary.

“Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently.”[1]Paul Levi, her former lover, published in 1922 a pamphlet that she had written criticising the suppression of democracy in the Bolshevik revolution: The Russian Revolution.

Without general elections, without unrestricted freedom of press and assembly, without a free struggle of opinion, life dies out in every public institution, becomes a mere semblance of life, in which only the bureaucracy remains as the active element. Public life gradually falls asleep, a few dozen party leaders of inexhaustible energy and boundless experience direct and rule. Among them, in reality only a dozen outstanding heads do the leading and an elite of the working class is invited from time to time to meetings where they are to applaud the speeches of the leaders, and to approve proposed resolutions unanimously – at bottom, then, a clique affair – a dictatorship.”[2]




[1] Rosa Luxemburg. The Russian Revolution, and Leninism or Marxism? The University of Michigan Press. 1961, p. 69.

[2]  Ibid., pp. 71-72.

 

Thursday 10 January 2019

Brexit, the engine and toilets of populism in Europe


Expo 2005 in Aichi, Japan. Toilets with Mozart’s music. On Sunday May 19, 2005. Photography by Vicente Alonso-Fontelos.


By Vicente Alonso-Fontelos.

 
Sixty-one percent of Britons who voted to leave the European Union believe their children will have less than their parents. Fifty years ago, several million British households did not have flushing toilets.
 
What is populism? I like Pierre Rosanvallon’s definition: “Populism is not just an ideology. It is a perverse inversion of the ideals and procedures of democracy.”

 We remember the unforgettable image, of Brexit campaign, of a middle-aged woman, wrapped in in the Union Jack, with her fist raised and spitting poison. And I read in The Daily Telegraph: “One of the reasons we voted Leave is to inoculate ourselves against Europe's toxic brand of populism” (Stanley,15 Dec 2018: 22).

Helmut Dubiel wrote a paper titled, “The Specter of Populism”, in the Berkeley Journal of Sociology (1986): The popularity of the Falkland war amongst the British public was supposed to have been "populist”. The young Tim Stanley, PhD in Philosophy, didn’t read Berkeley Journal of Sociology at this time, I supposed.  

If European unification was conceived in fear to Europeans’ wars between self. UK have not break off that atavist fear to lose your own sovereignty. But British nationalism have transformed on an unhinged behavior. And this nationalism in angry populism.

Ronald F. Inglehart and Pippa Norris written: “poorer white populations living in inner-city areas with concentrations of immigrantssusceptible to the anti-establishment, nativist, and xenophobic scare-mongering exploited of populist movements, parties, and leaders, blaming ‘Them’ for stripping prosperity, job opportunities, and public services from ‘Us’.  
 
Nativist is key word in depth meaning of Tim Stanley. All nationalists, populists and future neo-fascists do not understand how that process happens through themselves. But the beginning is the same: vaccinate ourselves ... or inoculate us from the others ... Hence the irrational fear of outsiders, who do not share the background, language and habits of the dominant tribe.

Nigel Farage is a populist born, eaten, drunk and educated like a pure Briton. Or is he a pure French? Populism is heroin in vein, and when you want to quit, you're hooked and you will sell your soul for a dose.

On Sunday, October 4, 1936, the black-shirted British Union of Fascists led by Oswald Mosley marched in support of his anti-Semitic policies. The anti-Fascists launched a counterdemonstration, and almost 100 people were arrested in the fighting that followed, dubbed the Battle of Cable Street. […] The sight of Mosley on the streets of London made people aware of what was happening and what could happen if they were allowed to get away with it" (Lewis, 2006: 32).

 
Who would have imagined that the land of the Levellers’ thought, An Agreement of the Free People of England and the Putney Debates, would become the nation of European populism bitterly divided?

 
Rainborough's claimed on 29th October 1647: “I desired that those that had engaged in it [might be included]. For really I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest he; and therefore truly, sir, I think it's clear, that every man that is to live under a government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that government” (Woodhouse, 1951: 53).

 
   Now, the black-shirted are yellow vests. Colors change. New times. Although it seems that the disappearance of British flushing toilets is not in danger. Another issue is toilet paper, mostly from the continent. Populist loo paper, of course. But in the pub discussions between pint and pint of beer, everyone will agree to use or not Times’ torn-up newspaper to wipe British bottoms with the picture of his Majesty: God Save the Queen!

 

References

Dubiel, H., 1986. The Specter of Populism. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, Vol. 31, pp. 79-91.

Inglehart, R. F. & Norris, P., 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.

Lewis, G., 2006. “International Brigade Medic.” Military History, 23, 2; pg. 32.

Rosanvallon, P., 2008. Counter-Democracy. Politics in an Age of Distrust. New York. Cambridge University Press.

Stanley, T., 15 Dec 2018.  Why you must turn to Twitter if you want a true picture of modern Britain. The Daily Telegraph, London: 22.

Woodhouse, A.S.P. 1951. Puritanism and Liberty. Begin the Army Debates (1647-9) from the Clarke Manuscripts. The University of Chicago Press, p. 53.
 


Thursday 23 August 2018

SWEEP ELITES. OCASIO-CORTEZ REVOLUTION



New York City, May 1993. By Vicente Alonso-Fontelos.
Ocasio-Cortez Revolution!
 
By Vicente Alonso-Fontelos. (From Order Number One)


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defeated current Democratic Congressman, Joe Crowley, with a wide margin primary victory for the 14th Congressional District of New York City. In the political summer before the midterm elections, the Democratic Party received a frozen bath. With a grassroots campaign at low level and support of a broad social groups, the young women, a political newcomer of 28 years-old, installed a new progressive agenda: to sweep left parties’ castes, and urged to the courage because the change can’t wait.
It is a new category of the classic ‘power for the people,’ without relying on the theory Lenin's revolutionary vanguard elite. Grassroots classic collective action political process, now it’s transformed in political power action. If the amazing proposal crosses the Atlantic Ocean and is available to spread on the other shore of the left, the importance of this movement will not reside only in the important Midterm Elections US.

She claims the old values of the Illustration and French Revolution as right and distribution of wealth towards the people; right and distribution of power to the people, with an exposure clear of political issues: working class, democracy, federal guarantee of employment, universal health, free public education, 100% renewable energy and immigration reform. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez challenges, without complexes, the new rampant populism: “I mean, are working class people. And to fail working class Americans is also to fail Latino Americans.”

The main newspapers supporters od Democratic Party have changed their initial critical opinion about these new politicians. Since The New York Times Op-Ed, When Liberals Become Progressives, Much is Lot in April 13, 2018, notifying the progressive cloud that loomed over the Democratic Party. The third time The New York Times wrote name of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, June 14, 2018, the editorial board added the adjective ‘insurgent’ in front: “an insurgent campaign from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez”. The night of win, an unfortunate photograph opened the breaking news in the home page of the online edition; and has now disappeared. The last time, August, 26 2018: “On Sunday, an admiring tribute to Mr. McCain tweeted by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez”. In the passing of this month, they are already the "Liberal Insurgency".

Some elected officials Democrats requirements to delete their pictures from activist political Facebook’s campaign, or refused meetings with key New York City leaders, because they didn't dare to be seen with them in public. But a comment of the leader of the United States Democratic House, Nancy Pelosi, downplaying Alexandria Ocasio victory it is unforgettable: “The merit in one district.”

‘Mini Obamas,’ ‘Insurgents,’ ‘tea party-style revolt,’ ‘outsiders Democrats.’ Although Obama didn’t then endorse candidacy them,  the former president is ratifying your politics proposals. And the message of the young progressives has penetrated among other Democratic candidates who have joined the illusion created by the female New Yorker. Representative Beto O'Rourke running against Ted Cruz for Senate Texas; Representative Ro Khanna of California, or Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts embrace to ‘liberal insurgents’ and talk new sense of urgency, boldness, and chance, because “we need new Democratic leadership.”

The new progressives demand a place in power and they do not wish to spend the campaign just defending their right to run. nor Communities choose these angered candidates to lead fight and face president Trump’s policies. But they want to run and win on their own terms, not ask permission to get in the door, not are waiting turn, as past generations. The new progressives are advocates for a democratic socialism: the social-welfare achievements of European social democracy, and a new model power engagement and participation.
Into a Democratic Party that doubts about identity politics, as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez points out, they present down generational, racial, ethnicity, and gender defies. What's Impossible?” express Tallahassee Mayor, Andrew Gillum, who could be the first African-American nominee for governor of Florida, without whoops.

Also, between these challengers so much are women to the left, and many are women of color, or of minorities. Some of that women could make history in the Midterm Elections. According to the Center for Women and Politics Americans, the potential-candidate are 345 women who ran for the House and the Senate as challengers. And 31 challenging in the headlines within the Party. If the broad success of women Democrats is indicative in current election cycle, the presence of women in the progressive ranks is overwhelming.

And so, Stacey Abrams, running in Georgia; Jahana Hayes, in Connecticut; Rashida Tlaib, in Detroit; Lauren Underwood, in Illinois. Or Ayanna Pressley's surprise, the first African-American woman to become nominee to represent Massachusetts on Capitol Hill, trounced Representative Mike Capuano, a white well-funded by corporates, and over and over liberal incumbent.
Bernier’s smart troops face Trump’s adoquin troops.  Many young promises of the Western Left (who have never placed a yogurt on of a supermarket's shelf), excited about this new insurgency, should know that their counterparts will come to sweep them of the political map.

The young American insurgency has only to project its vital experience of belonging within the communities where it lives. That is the criticism contained in the message sent to the elites of the democratic party: “You don’t live among us, don’t breathe our air, don’t drink our water.” This framing that, in the mouths of other leaders would be dogmatic, is showed as an effective political tool, because it is based on a true closeness to the people around them, and that is what makes this movement different.

These new progressives have achieved a high level of higher education that allows them to participate in politics but, far from distancing themselves from their neighbors, they coexist with them. They have moved away from political patronage of liberal wing of the Democratic Party, and they have decided to obtain political power directly supported by their assets neighboring. They want to empower at working class.
This engagement produces results that, in turn, distance them from the populist left temptation because they do not need it as a political strategy to win elections, unlike Jean-Luc Mélenchon, in France; or Jeremy Corbin, in the Kingdom United, according to Mouffe.

The world of the second post-war period built on Keynesian full-employment commitment and the social democratic welfare-state, guaranteeing full employment, and establishing social peace in a more egalitarian and fairness society, where its citizens would be protected by that State throughout their lives, need a new redefinition and a fresh set of policies.
These young activists political try to give a solution constructing a form of responsible capitalism, empowering working class and pain people. They know that, as important as it is to include and observe differences, political success requires a shared vision and approach to issues of sustainability.

 


 


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, May 26, 2018. Photography by Corey Torpie / Courtesy of the Ocasio-Cortez Campaign.